Skip to Content

Avoided Deforestation and Degradation

FERN’s aim is for an EU commitment to halting forest loss in a way that ensures forest peoples’ rights and is not based on carbon offsets.

 

FERN’s analysis: Initiatives which focus on reducing deforestation are rightly deemed as urgent, but there is a real danger that the focus on carbon will distract from dealing with the real drivers of deforestation. This is particularly true for Initiatives aimed at to reduce emissions from deforestation and degradation (REDD). They could easily end up delaying the necessary transition to low carbon economies if they allow for industralised countries to offset their own fossil fuel emissions with claimed reductions in deforestation elsewhere. FERN also shares the concern that as forests gain in monetary value as a result of the international REDD debates, forest peoples' rights are increasingly violated. Already incidents abound where private investors buy up forested land and national governments assert their perceived rights over forest lands to the detriment of local communities, in order to benefit from forest carbon cash.


What FERN is doing:
FERN is campaigning for an EU commitment to halting forest loss in a way that respects indigenous peoples' rights, recognises the needs of forest dependent communities and where EU funding does not lead to the creation of carbon offsets. Without recognising forest peoples' rights, without improved forest governance and without addressing the drivers of deforestation - including overconsumption - it will not be possible to reduce forest loss.

 

Funding for schemes aimed at halting deforestation must not be generated through carbon offsets. Carbon trading will not provide money for those forest protection activties most needed, will lock Southern countries into expensive and futile exercises to 'accurately' meaure forest carbon, and will act as an excuse for industrialised countries to delay the necessary drastic cuts in greenhouse gas emissions. FERN is therefore campaigning for industrialised countries to exclude carbon offsetting as a source of funding for activities to halt deforestation.

 

To learn more about this campaign read  “walking the tightrope to success”, signed onto by more than 20 organisations.

Cutting corners; how the FCPF is failing forests and peoples

A FERN-FPP report analysing nine different country proposals (R-PINs) to get money from the World Bank's Forest Carbon Partnership Facility (FCPF). The report concludes that both the process and the proposals adopted do not respect the Bank's own guidelines. The report also includes an annex which details the World Bank funded REDD process.

DocumentsSize
application/pdf iconOPEN in English1.3 MB
application/pdf iconOUVRIR en français1.56 MB

Forest watch Issue 145 and Copenhagen Special

  • EU Member States reject prohibition of the sale of illegal timber
  • NGOs reject Ecolabel for copying and graphic paper
  • Will Europe follow America’s ECAs in reducing GHGs
  • Integrated Product Policy and Beyond
  • Member States’ support binding biomass criteria
  • Copenhagen Update (Available in French and Spanish)
DocumentsSize
application/pdf iconFW 145 Jan 2010.pdf184.82 KB
application/pdf iconCopenhagen update.pdf124.79 KB
application/pdf iconCopenhagen update in French.pdf189.37 KB
application/pdf iconCopenhagen update in Spanish.pdf132.46 KB

Gordon Brown’s post Copenhagen rhetoric likely to turn a tragedy into a catastrophe

Four days after the Copenhagen summit ended without an agreement, NGOs are warning that Gordon Brown’s finger pointing and the growing media hum about the need for ‘major reform of the UN process’ are the first steps in a process whereby wealthy nations can unilaterally come up with “solutions” that will condemn millions to death.

DocumentSize
application/pdf iconTragedy into a catastrophe Press Release 23 Dec 2009.pdf72.56 KB

Civil society concerned that REDD deal will not stop the forests from falling

On 17 December 2009, the penultimate day of the UN climate conference in Copenhagen, over 100 civil society groups from all continents voiced their concern that the proposed deal on Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation (REDD) is likely to fail, despite being described as the most significant likely outcome of the conference.

Concerned about the repercussions of the UN climate negotiations on REDD, civil society organisations in India issued a Joint Statement on REDD Climate Schemes in December 2009, highlighting how government and corporate interests "use climate change negotiations to illegally and unjustly enhance their control over forests and forest dwellers' resource". In Brasil, social movements released an open letter in October 2009, calling on the Brazilian Government to reject the idea of using REDD as a carbon market-based mechanism and of accepting it as a means to compensate the emissions from Northern countries.

 

DocumentsSize
application/pdf iconFlawed REDD deal72.72 KB

Why Congo Basin countries stand to lose out from a market based REDD

This briefing paper unravels the implications of setting a historical baseline with a correction factor for low deforestation countries. It also explains why carbon markets are unlikely to raise the anticipated funds for forest protection, due to the unsuitability of applying these policy mechanisms to forests, and why any funds raised are unlikely to reach Central Africa or other regions with low deforestation rates and weak governance. Wider institutional and policy reforms, which are crucial to tackling deforestation effectively, would be better addressed by a funding mechanism which does not involve the trading of carbon. 

DocumentSize
application/pdf iconcongo basin countries lose out.pdf285.04 KB

Forest Watch Issue 144 and update from Barcelona

  • Climate, energy and environment change
  • A binding forest agreement?
  • Biomass: binding sustainability criteria needed
  • FERN.org relaunched
  • First US illegal timber investigation
  • EU ratifies Ghana VPA
  • Palm oil funding frozen
  • Update from UNFCCC Barcelona meeting
DocumentsSize
application/pdf iconFW 144 December 2009213.17 KB
application/pdf iconBarcelona update118.32 KB

Forest Watch Issue 143 November 2009

  • EU Council reaches a troubling conclusion
  • Flawed bioenergy policies will fail EU forests
  • CAR VPA negotiations calendar ambitious
  • CDM to open doors to large scale plantations
DocumentSize
application/pdf iconFW 143 Nov 2009.pdf212.16 KB

Forest Watch issue 142

  • G-20 Pittsburgh statement hopeful but clarity needed
  • Liberia’s choice
  • Malaysian déjà vu should suspend VPA process
  • Protesting Monoculture Tree Plantations
     
DocumentSize
application/pdf iconFW 142 Oct 2009.pdf196.7 KB

Forest Watch issue 141

  • Obstacles on the road to sustainable bioenergy criteria
  • Climate haggling... to be continued
  • UK timber procurement: Help shape criteria
  • The Saami Council applauds breakthrough
DocumentSize
application/pdf iconOPEN179.99 KB