Skip to Content

Bioenergy

File 4567FERN’s aim is to achieve EU energy policies that enable the EU to meet its rural development objectives, biodiversity targets and climate objectives.

 

FERN’s analysis: Whilst the need to reduce our use of and dependence on fossil fuels is clear, we must be careful that we don’t come up with a solution that causes more of a problem. Biomass has always been an important source of energy, but whether it is a 'renewable' energy source, depends on how it is produced. The EU's current energy policies will give biomass production for energy purposes a significant boost. The danger is that this will not contribute to a reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, but will lead to many negative environmental and social impacts. FERN believes that the utmost effort should be put into reducing energy consumption, and while biomass can play a part of the future energy mix, it should only be considered under certain conditions.  

 

What FERN is doing: FERN is looking at the extent to which using biomass for heat and power can be a sustainable solution. Important questions that need to be asked include: How to use scarce resources efficiently; How to limit the negative impact of biomass production on the environment and local communities; and how to ensure that biomass is effectively leading to a decrease of greenhouse gas emissions?

 

To learn more about this campaign: the best documents to read are "Biomass Report shows increasing lack of policy coherence on forest protection", "Increased use of biomass: recommendations for ensuring it is environmentally responsible and socially just", "Volunteering for disaster: why biomass criteria must be ambitious and legally binding" and "Woody Biomass for Energy: NGO Concerns and Recommendations".

 

Presentations from "Biomass and resource efficiency: The need for a supply-led approach to forest productivity"

November 18, 2011

File 5857

“Measures are needed to ensure use of forest products is not guided by unregulated demand, but by what forests can sustainably supply,” this was one of the conclusions of the "Biomass and Resource Efficiency" event attended by more than 70 people at the European Parliament. It was organised by FERN, ClientEarth, the Greens and Grupo PPE.

The three attached presentations come from Marcus Lindner, looking at European Forests and the EUWood study, Sten Nillson looking at the global situation and Joost Van de Velde, looking at wider global trends.

Bas Eickhout MEP, concluded the event by stating that "Sustainability criteria for bioenergy are crucialThat does not mean we should support low and unambitious criteria.  If the criteria turn out to be very weakwe have to vote against and demand a stronger proposal. I therefore urge the Commission to put a proposal on the table that properly addresses the carbon debt of biomass."

 

DocumentsSize
application/pdf iconVandevelde_Biomass Resources EP 101111 V2.pdf1.93 MB
application/pdf iconLindner_EUwood_EU-Parliament_10Nov2011.pdf1.8 MB
application/pdf iconNilsson_Brussels_Europ-Parlia-reduced-1.pdf1.86 MB

Flows of biomass to and from the EU

September 14, 2011

 

File 5771

This new report shows that the quantity of wood required to satisfy the European Union’s 20-20-20 target is likely to be too large to be met by increased production within the EU. Member States will have to rely on importing wood products from elsewhere, at the risk of damaging ecosystems in other parts of the world, while actually increasing the EU’s own carbon footprint.

The report is based on an analysis of Member States’ National Renewable Energy Action Plans and import and export statistics and trends. It finds that assuming that the mix of different biomass 'product types' remains the same, Member States will need to use between 50 and 100 per cent more wood than is currently consumed as fuel. 

DocumentSize
application/pdf iconBiomass imports to the EU final.pdf1.04 MB

European Commission sued for lack of transparency on biofuels policy

June 3, 2011

The European Commission has been sued, accused of violating European transparency laws. Environmental law organisation ClientEarth, Friends of the Earth Europe (FOEE), FERN and Corporate Europe Observatory (CEO) filed the lawsuit following the Commission’s refusal to provide access to information in decisions relating to Europe's biofuels policy.

DocumentsSize
application/pdf iconapplication-to-court-250511.pdf828.76 KB
application/pdf iconannexes-biofuels3-v-commission.pdf5.9 MB

European Commission sued for lack of transparency on biofuels policy

May 26, 2011

Brussels, May 26, 2011 - The European Commission was sued today, accused of violating European transparency laws. Environmental law organisation ClientEarth, Friends of the Earth Europe (FOEE), FERN and Corporate Europe Observatory (CEO) filed the lawsuit following the Commission’s refusal to provide access to information in decisions relating to the sustainability of Europe’s biofuels policy.

DocumentSize
application/pdf iconBiofuels and transparency.pdf185.15 KB

Woody Biomass for Energy: NGO Concerns and Recommendations

April 28, 2011

File 5632

The European Commission recently consulted on its preparation of a report on additional sustainability measures at EU level for solid and gaseous biomass used in electricity, heating and cooling. This consultation failed to ask the right questions or to create the right framework for a meaningful debate on biomass, despite the urgent need for such a debate. Eleven NGOs therefore produced the report “Woody biomass for energy: NGO concerns and recommendations” as complementary input into this debate.

DocumentSize
application/pdf iconNGO Report on Biomass 11 April 2011.pdf798.35 KB

ForestWatch Issue 159 April 2011

April 11, 2011
  • Carbon as commodity: Reducing emissions or filling pockets?
  • Will biofuels sustainability criteria prevent destruction of biodiversity?
  • Many viewpoints, one view: Rethink carbon offsets
  • World Forest Day: putting on a brave face
  • Palm oil plantations: A problem shifts from here to there
  • SGS barred from issuing new FSC certificates in Brazil – for now
  • Shine a light on ECA activities
  • UK: Finally, a precedent to rely on
  • Parliament vote to improve ECA accountability

 

DocumentSize
application/pdf iconFW 159 April double 2011.pdf279.32 KB

ForestWatch Issue 158

March 11, 2011
DocumentSize
application/pdf iconFW 158 March 2011.pdf226.41 KB

Forestwatch Issue 156 and Cancun and International Year of the Forest Specials

January 21, 2011

Welcome to the first Forest Watch of 2011. This is also United Nations Year of the Forest and so FERN has written a two-page Forest Watch special looking at the state of play for forests through the lens of our campaigns which can be accessed below. Last month too was  an important month for forests due to decisions made at the 16th Conference of the Parties in Cancun. FERN’s two-page special report from that meeting is attached below. Articles in this months Forest Watch include:

  • VPA processes see slow progression
  • Paralysis by Analysis
  • ‘Sustainable on Paper’
  • Congo approves a law to protect indigenous peoples
  • EEAS and DEVCO: the new EU external relations jargon
DocumentsSize
application/pdf iconCancun update.pdf136.32 KB
application/pdf iconYear of the forest special.pdf133.3 KB
application/pdf iconFW 156 January 2011.pdf607.47 KB
application/pdf iconFR_Cancun-update.pdf561.67 KB

ForestWatch Issue 155 December 2010

December 15, 2010
  • Social criteria are permissible in timber procurement policy
  • Questions remain about Cancun forests agreement
  • A bold move: the EP votes to address ECA flaws
  • The future of CAP: opinions welcome
  • Agrofuel plans drive destruction

DocumentSize
application/pdf iconFW 155 December 2010.pdf217.33 KB

Driving to destruction

November 8, 2010

This study analyses the likely impacts on land use and greenhouse gas emissions of biofuel use by 2020, as projected in recently published National Renewable Energy Action Plans in 23 EU member states. The analysis includes evidence on size and impacts of ‘indirect land use change’ (ILUC) resulting from biofuel use.

It is the most comprehensive study to date to quantify these eff ects. The study reveals that the EU’s plans for biofuels will result in the conversion of up to 69 000 square kilometres (km2) of land to agricultural use due to ILUC. This will potentially put forests, other natural ecosystems, and poor communities at risk. Land conversion on such a scale will lead to the release of carbon emissions from vegetation and soil, making biofuels more damaging to the climate than the fossil fuels they are designed to replace.

 
DocumentSize
application/pdf iconILUC-NAPs Briefing.pdf379.25 KB