Skip to Content

Bioenergy

FERN’s aim is to achieve EU energy policies that enable the EU to meet its rural development objectives, biodiversity targets and climate objectives.

 

FERN’s analysis: Whilst the need to reduce our use of and dependence on fossil fuels is clear, we must be careful that we don’t come up with a solution that causes more of a problem. Biomass has always been an important source of energy, but whether it is a 'renewable' energy source, depends on how it is produced. The EU's current energy policies will give biomass production for energy purposes a significant boost. The danger is that this will not contribute to a reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, but will lead to many negative environmental and social impacts. FERN believes that the utmost effort should be put into reducing energy consumption, and while biomass can play a part of the future energy mix, it should only be considered under certain conditions.  

What FERN is doing: FERN is looking at the extent to which using biomass for heat and power can be a sustainable solution. Important questions that need to be asked include: How to use scarce resources efficiently; How to limit the negative impact of biomass production on the environment and local communities; and how to ensure that biomass is effectively leading to a decrease of greenhouse gas emissions?

To learn more about this campaign: the best documents to read are "Biomass Report shows increasing lack of policy coherence on forest protection", "Increased use of biomass: recommendations for ensuring it is environmentally responsible and socially just", "Volunteering for disaster: why biomass criteria must be ambitious and legally binding" and "Woody Biomass for Energy: NGO Concerns and Recommendations".

 

Most recent publications

Woody Biomass for Energy: NGO Concerns and Recommendations

The European Commission recently consulted on its preparation of a report on additional sustainability measures at EU level for solid and gaseous biomass used in electricity, heating and cooling. This consultation failed to ask the right questions or to create the right framework for a meaningful debate on biomass, despite the urgent need for such a debate. Eleven NGOs therefore produced the report “Woody biomass for energy: NGO concerns and recommendations” as complementary input into this debate.

ForestWatch Issue 159 April 2011

  • Carbon as commodity: Reducing emissions or filling pockets?
  • Will biofuels sustainability criteria prevent destruction of biodiversity?
  • Many viewpoints, one view: Rethink carbon offsets
  • World Forest Day: putting on a brave face
  • Palm oil plantations: A problem shifts from here to there
  • SGS barred from issuing new FSC certificates in Brazil – for now
  • Shine a light on ECA activities
  • UK: Finally, a precedent to rely on
  • Parliament vote to improve ECA accountability

DocumentSize
FW 159 April double 2011.pdf279.32 KB

ForestWatch Issue 158

DocumentSize
FW 158 March 2011.pdf226.41 KB

Forestwatch Issue 156 and Cancun and International Year of the Forest Specials

Welcome to the first Forest Watch of 2011. This is also United Nations Year of the Forest and so FERN has written a two-page Forest Watch special looking at the state of play for forests through the lens of our campaigns which can be accessed below. Last month too was  an important month for forests due to decisions made at the 16th Conference of the Parties in Cancun. FERN’s two-page special report from that meeting is attached below. Articles in this months Forest Watch include:

ForestWatch Issue 155 December 2010

  • Social criteria are permissible in timber procurement policy
  • Questions remain about Cancun forests agreement
  • A bold move: the EP votes to address ECA flaws
  • The future of CAP: opinions welcome
  • Agrofuel plans drive destruction

DocumentSize
FW 155 December 2010.pdf217.33 KB

Driving to destruction

This study analyses the likely impacts on land use and greenhouse gas emissions of biofuel use by 2020, as projected in recently published National Renewable Energy Action Plans in 23 EU member states. The analysis includes evidence on size and impacts of ‘indirect land use change’ (ILUC) resulting from biofuel use.

DocumentSize
ILUC-NAPs Briefing.pdf379.25 KB

Pages