Certification and Procurement
FERN’s aim is to encourage certification schemes to implement standards which recognise forest peoples’ rights and improve forestry practices and legislation. Our work on timber procurement aims to push the EU and Member States to consider certification, rights and forestry practices in their procurement policies.
FERN’s analysis: Certification is now a mainstream issue that can affect the decisions behind virtually every item we buy. However, when it comes to timber, there are serious problems translating this into improvements on the ground. Certification schemes are often dominated by the forestry industry or forest owners and even if this is not the case, certification bodies are increasingly certifying operations with very poor forest management practices that don’t recognise the rights of local communities.
What FERN is doing: FERN supports groups to campaign against problematic certification operations or schemes whilst working to improve the policies of the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) and ensure they are implemented. FERN is also actively involved in getting the EU and Member States to have clear timber procurement policies which outlaw purchasing from non-certified sources.
To learn more about this campaign: see FERN’s statement on FSC, Footprints in the forest and buying a sustainable future.
Most recent publications
Assessment of the European Commission's proposal for the revision of Public Procurement Directives
The Network for sustainable development in public procurement (NSPP) has conducted an assessment of the European Commission's proposal for the revision of the Public Procurement Directives.
| Document | Size |
|---|---|
| 480.48 KB |
Statement from NGOs on the EU Ecolabel and Asia Pulp and Paper
In 2006 the EU Ecolabel was awarded to two brands of photocopy paper – Golden Plus and Lucky Boss – produced by the Indonesian company Pindo Deli, a subsidiary of APP. In 2010, FERN published “EU Ecolabel allows forest destruction – the case of Pindo Deli,” questioning how the Ecolabel could be awarded to paper from a company such as Pindo Deli. It also exposed the flaws of the system: overall lack of transparency of the EU Ecolabel award process, the lack of a formal complaints mechanism and the weakness of the criteria for providing an EU Ecolabel to copying and graphic paper.
Following this report, the European Commission has asked the French competent body AFNOR, the same body that had advised the EU to provide an EU Ecolabel to APP in the first place, to investigate whether APP should have received the EU Ecolabel by doing an on-site audit of the APP/Pindo Deli mills.
In November 2011, the Commission announced that AFNOR’s audit proved there was full compliance with the criteria of the EU Ecolabel for copying and graphic paper valid at that time, and especially with the criteria on sustainable forest management. This statement from fourteen NGOs, explains why this is not a satisfactory conclusion and what needs to happen next in order to stop the EU flower from withering further.
| Document | Size |
|---|---|
| 186.49 KB |
Letter from Asia Pulp and Paper's lawyer re: FERN's report on Pindo Deli
On 21 November 2011, FERN was sent the attached letter from APP's lawyers. We will not be removing the report 'EU Ecolabel allows forest destruction - the case of Pindo Deli' from our site as we stand by the information in that document and the conclusion the EU Ecolabel needs to improve its transparency. For further information please see 'The EU Ecolabel and Asia Pulp and Paper' an NGO statement signed onto by fourteen NGOs.
| Document | Size |
|---|---|
| 189.44 KB |






