Skip to Content

Certification and Procurement

FERN’s aim is to advance the debate about the contribution of certification schemes to strengthening forest peoples’ rights and improving forestry practices and legislation. Our work on timber procurement aims to ensure the EU and Member States include forest peoples´rights and responsible forestry practices in their procurement policies.

FERN’s analysis: Whether or not to choose certified products is now an issue many people will have considered, as certification schemes have been developed for virtually every item on sale. Experience with certification schemes related to forest management during the past two decades has however shown the limits of certification in achieving real change in forestry practises on the ground. Certification schemes are often dominated by the forestry sector and, where this is not the case, certification bodies are increasingly certifying operations with poor forest management practices or that don’t fully recognise the rights of local communities.          

What FERN is doing: FERN supports groups to campaign against problematic certification operations or schemes. FERN is also actively involved in advocacy to ensure the EU and Member States's procurement policies will effectively outlaw purchasing from destructive forestry operations and use certification schemes where these can provide credible assurance of delivering timber from well-managed operations.

To learn more about this campaign: see FERN's statement to the Forest Stewardship Council on withdrawing FERN's membership, FERN’s statement on FSC, Footprints in the forest and Buying a sustainable future.

Most recent publications

Forestwatch issue 140

  • Ilisu dam: teetering at the edge
  • Liberia’s dubious timber concessions
  • UK Environmental Audit Committee heeded
  • EU aid: must do better
DocumentSize
FW 140.pdf176.55 KB
Bonn II meeting update.pdf131.11 KB

Forest Watch Issue 139

  • New DG for Climate and Energy criticised
  • GPP: Be heard!
  • R-Plans: Indigenous and local communities stand firm
  • Not so fast, M. de Larosière!
  • Commission must sharpen development policy tools
  • Cameroon VPA negotiation concludes
  • Biomass update
DocumentSize
FW 139.pdf211.67 KB
Biomass update.pdf74.63 KB

Regaining credibility and rebuilding support: changes the FSC needs to make

A joint statement by FERN, Greenpeace, Inter-African Forest Industry Association, Precious Woods, Swedish Society for Nature Conservation and Tropical Forest Trust, detailing which changes this group the FSC needs to make to regain its credibility.

DocumentSize
changes the FSC needs to make.pdf27.33 KB

UK Government decision undermines its own timber policy

A joint press release by FERN, FoE, Greenpeace and WWF stating that the UK Government's timber procurement policy accepts forest destruction as sustainable. The press release is a response to a press release by DEFRA anouncing the UK Government accepts PEFC, SFI, CSA and FSC as proof of sustainable timber production and of MTCC as proof of legal timber production in light of their procurement policy.

DocumentSize
OPEN123.5 KB

Social Criteria in Timber Procurement Policies II

 A legal opinion commissioned by WWF UK on whether EU Governments are allowed under EU law to include social criteria in their procurement policies. The study concludes that this is indeed the case

DocumentSize
OPEN58.5 KB

Social Criteria in Timber Procurement Policies

A legal opinion commissioned by FoE Netherlands and ICCO Netherlands on the question whether EU Governments are allowed to include social criteria in their timber procurement policies. The study concludes that this is very well possible

DocumentSize
OPEN117.5 KB

Pages