Skip to Content

Forest Protection Policy

In early March 2010, the European Commission adopted a green paper about the protection of forests in Europe against climate change. The discussion it generates should guide Commission decisions on whether additional action is needed at the EU level to protect forests. Whilst the paper highlights some important issues such as the need for more harmonised, reliable and comprehensive information systems to assess forest resources and conditions, it seriously fails to make a proper analysis of the lack of coherence of EU and Member States policies that have an impact on forests.

Relevant reports

EU documents

 

Campaigns: 

Most recent publications

What changes are needed? The implementation of EU's Rural Development Policy

This report follows up FERN’s earlier study “Funding forests into the future? How the European Fund for Rural Development affects Europe’s forests”. It focuses on how national programmes – and more specifically their forestry measures – have been implemented in six countries. The key questions that are looked at in the report include: What, if anything, have the individual countries done to address the issues raised in 2008, and can implementation of the RDPs do anything to improve forestry management practices and encourage forest conservation? 

 

DocumentSize
PDF iconWhat changes are needed.pdf1.06 MB

Forestwatch Issue 148 April 2010

  • The FLEGT process continues to give a voice to civil society
  • Time to end subsidies that harm biodiversity
  • Dutch NGOs lodge a complaint concerning MTCS
  • EU Ecolabel – Not so green
  • Disingenuous biofuels numbers
DocumentSize
PDF iconFW 148 April 2010.pdf195.87 KB

NGO participation in the rural development policy

Forests cover more than 42 per cent of European Union (EU) land, almost as large an area as is covered by agricultural production. Most support for forest practices in the EU comes from Rural Development policy, the second pillar of the EU’s Common Agricultural Policy (CAP).

On paper, the current Rural Development Regulation requires consultations to take place at different levels (known as the ‘partnership principle’). In practice however, the input of stakeholders can still be improved.

DocumentSize
PDF iconOPEN1.42 MB

The lack of coherence between national rural development programmes and EU environmental commitments


The European Union (EU) is signatory to several environmental commitments, including the Göteborg commitments to reserve biodiversity decline by 2010 and the Kyoto Protocol targets for climate change mitigation. These commitments should be supported by EU policies such as the Rural Development Regulation. This briefing note looks at the expected effect of six EU Member States’ rural development programmes, and finds that, all too often, they are likely to undermine rather than support the EU’s environmental commitments.

DocumentSize
PDF iconOPEN1.55 MB

Is the rural development policy supporting good forest management and biodiversity conservation?


The European Union’s (EU) Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) is the largest EU source of support for forest practices. This money sits under the Rural Development pillar of the CAP and the policy which guides this funding is the Rural Development Regulation (RDR). This briefing note considers whether the RDR is contributing to good forest management and biodiversity conservation by looking at both afforestation measures and Natura 2000 (forest) payments of six countries.

DocumentSize
PDF iconOPEN1.92 MB

Forestwatch Issue 147 and Biomass Report Special

  • EU Emissions Trading Scheme an ‘open door’ for crime?
  • Green Paper shows Commission is green on forest protection
  • German state allows short-rotation plantations in forests
  • Growing biofuel concern
  • WTO versus WEO
  • Biomass Report shows increasing lack of policy coherence on forest protection
DocumentSize
PDF iconFW 147 March 2010.pdf192.74 KB
PDF iconBiomass report special.pdf133.65 KB

Pages