Skip to Content

What are carbon sinks?

A carbon sink is anything that absorbs more carbon than it releases as carbon dioxide. European forests are currently a net carbon sink as they take in more carbon than they emit. In climate negotiations, this temporary reduction of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is also known as negative emissions.  

Forest carbon sinks are not an excuse to delay action in reducing fossil fuel emissions. This is because carbon absorbed by trees is dynamic. Forest carbon moves between the atmosphere (as carbon dioxide) and the tree (as carbon) in a continuous cycle, known as the forest carbon cycle.

Carbon stored in fossil fuel is static, remaining trapped outside the atmosphere for thousands of years.  This means that forests can never cancel out or ‘offset’ emissions from fossil sources. Using forest carbon sinks to justify carbon dioxide emissions from fossil sources will increase concentrations of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, making it impossible to meet the global goal of keeping international temperature rises to well below 2°C.

Despite the clear difference between fossil and forest carbon, United Nations climate negotiators often suggest that planting trees or reducing deforestation is equivalent to reducing emissions from burning fossil fuels. Until this myth is finally busted, schemes to reduce emissions from deforestation and degradation (REDD), the Clean Development Mechanism or LULUCF have the potential to do more harm than good.

While it is quite possible to keep coal in the hole and oil in the soil, no government or company can ever ensure that carbon will remain in trees. Forest fires, insect outbreaks, decay, logging, land use changes and the decline of forest ecosystems as a result of climate change are all hard or impossible to control. This doesn’t mean we shouldn’t try to protect and restore forests, just that we need to do it at the same time as reducing fossil fuel emissions to zero.

For more information on any of these issues please see REDD-Monitor or Fern’s video on LULUCF.

Most recent publications

Sinks in the Kyoto Protocol: A dirty deal for forests, forest peoples and the climate

The report assesses the potential impacts on forests and forest peoples of granting carbon credits to forest-related projects under the Kyoto Protocol's Clean Development Mechanism.

DocumentSize
PDF iconSinks in the Kyoto protocol1.08 MB

Forestwatch Issue 54

  • Bonn climate talks in disarray
  • NGOs call for EU-ban on illegal timber imports
  • Jury still out on UNFF
  • Revamped GSP needs clear forest standards
DocumentSize
PDF iconOPEN75.9 KB

Forestwatch Issue 53

  • New report finds major flaws in PEFC claims
  • Greenwash for carbon sinks
  • New rules for ECAs
  • Sold down the river
  • Green claims
DocumentSize
PDF iconOPEN76.03 KB

Forestwatch Issue 52

  • After Washington EU must step up climate plans
  • Ombudsman sees through Commission
  • Campaign: Export Credit Agencies
  • Forests misunderstood
  • Calls for action grow as first BAPs produced
DocumentSize
PDF iconOPEN76.13 KB

Forestwatch Issue 50

  • Concerns on mutual recognition
  • Sixth EAP plan positions forests low on the agenda
  • Action on indigenous peoples long overdue
  • Convention discrepencies
DocumentSize
PDF iconOPEN76.25 KB

Pages