Informing NGOs, MEPs, Member States, the European Commission and the media.  Issue 95, April 2005.

 

DG Trade talks with NGOs from the South

On 12 April 2005 DG Trade of the Commission hosted a civil society consultation meeting on illegal logging, attended by NGO representatives from Ghana, Cameroon, Congo DRC, Congo Brazzaville, Brazil and Indonesia.

The representatives portrayed a gloomy picture of activities of the timber industry leading to illegal logging rates of up to 90 per cent in Brazil, Indonesia and Ghana. Although supportive of the

Commission’s FLEGT Action Plan and in principle positive about the development of partnership agreements with producer countries, the representatives asked the Commission to – among other demands - guarantee full and informed participation of NGOs and local community groups in the development of partnership agreements [1].

Legislation outlawing the import and sale of illegally sourced timber was seen as an important step to make the timber industry accountable, as European companies are heavily implicated in illegal logging activities, notably in Central Africa.

This demand was echoed last month by over 70 timber companies and their federations, such as the UK Timber Trade Federation, the Dutch Timber Trade Federation, B&Q and IKEA. A joint statement on 29 March was subsequently produced calling on the Commission to develop legislation outlawing illegal timber [2]. As the UK and Dutch timber trade federations have experienced that none of the Indonesian sawmills supplying timber to the Dutch and UK markets were able to produce legally sourced timber, there is a still a long way to go.

The Commission promised to look into all the arguments carefully, although indicated that in their opinion legislation would not contribute to solving the problem due to technical and political reasons. They also invited all participants to another consultation meeting to discuss a sustainability impact assessment, carried out on behalf of DG Trade by Indufor, on the EU’s trade position, including the EU FLEGT action plan, and its impact on forests in mid May [3].

 

[1] Detailed demands of NGOs from Indonesia, Congo, Cameroon and Ghana are available from FERN (info@fern.org)

[2] Statement available from FERN

[3] For more details please contact FERN

 

Environmental degradation blocks the road to development goals

EU development goals of poverty reduction and sustainable development will not be met if environmental concerns continue to be neglected. Instead, environmental damage will increase poverty. This is not only the conclusion of the recently published UN Millennium Ecosystem Assessment [1], but has been underlined in the newest 'development package' of the European Commission [2].

The package, approved on 12 April, makes proposals in the areas of Finance and Coherence for Development, with a specific focus on Africa. It states that it is vital to scale up resources to achieve

development goals and highlight the links between poverty, environmental damage and security. The dependence of the poor on natural resources has to be understood by Finance Ministries and donors.

The documents note the first challenge for the EU: to address the impact of its production and consumption patterns. But it's yet to be seen how ‘sustainable’ language used in communications can be translated into a real improvement of policy coherence. The depredatory EU trade, agriculture and fisheries policies need to be challenged if the EU wants to speed up progress towards development goals.

To clearly state its commitment to sustainability, the Commission should make this goal equal to relieving poverty in the now-under-review EC development policy. The communication, due out in

May, should leave no doubts about the fact that poverty reduction can only be reached if pursued hand-in-hand with the fight against unsustainable development.

 

[1] UN (30 March) Millennium Ecosystem Assessment: Synthesis Report.

[2] COM (2005)132, COM (2005)133 and COM(2005)134

 

Commission must pull its weight

The Court of Auditors - the EC financial watchdog - has urged the Commission to provide better support to partner countries' delegations and improve thematic expertise.

Published on 17 May 2005, the audit [1] analyses the impact of the ongoing reform of EC aid management (see FW no. 43). Although it’s too early to see improvements in the quality of EC aid, the Court considers that in general EC delegations have been “reasonably” well prepared to undertake management tasks and responsibilities that were until now addressed by Brussels staff.

This exercise has led to “a better understanding of local conditions, risks and opportunities”.

Unfortunately, the Commission headquarters are lagging behind and finding it difficult to move away from managing projects towards helping delegations. Moreover, as many thematic experts (forest example on forests and gender) are leaving Brussels to fulfil the staff demand of growing delegations, the existing under-staffing problem in Brussels for these areas has increased.

In its recommendations, the audit adds new elements for the Commission. The Commission should now improve the weak areas pointed out in the audit. Some of the areas where improvement is needed include: recruiting staff with appropriate expertise in Brussels and delegations, ensuring provision of quality support to delegations, improving financial information systems, addressing outstanding training needs and simplifying procedures.

 

[1] http://www.eca.eu.int/audit_reports/special_reports/docs/2004/rs10_04en.pdf

 

Plantations in Brazil present threat to indigenous peoples

An Amnesty International report released on 30 March, Foreigners in our own country: Indigenous Peoples in Brazil [1], stated that despite the “Commitment to the Indigenous Peoples of Brazil” in the Brazilian government’s 2002 manifesto, violence against indigenous peoples continues.

In 2003, violence against indigenous peoples escalated, with the majority of 23 recorded killings attributed to land disputes. The AI report points to the involvement of logging companies, land owners and the military in these violent situations. It refers to the Guarani-Kaiowá, who live on “some of the smallest, poorest and most densely populated indigenous areas in Brazil: rural pockets of poverty surrounded by large soya and sugar cane plantations.”

The findings of the report underline the need for EU aid, trade and investment policies that ensure indigenous rights are respected - a demand frequently voiced by FERN and highlighted in a joint letter in February [2] from European NGOs working to promote the recognition of indigenous peoples’ rights.

 

[1] Available at http://web.amnesty.org/library/Index/ENGAMR190022005

[2] Available from FERN

 

NEWS IN BRIEF

Sarayaku demand protection

Sarayaku, an indigenous people in Ecuador, is insisting that their government complies with precautionary measures of a 2004 Inter- American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR) resolution to protect their community [1]. The government of Ecuador and the CGC oil company, who received a government-auctioned concession to Sarayaku land in 1996, have repeatedly invaded their land without

consent and recently reported that Sarayaku opposition to oil extraction in its territory is an attack on the sovereignty of Ecuador. A final ruling by the IACHR is expected in October. If favourable, it would have huge implications for indigenous peoples’ rights, by showing that governments can not grant concessions to companies without the consent of indigenous peoples occupying the land.

 

[1] http://www.cidh.org/annualrep/2004eng/ecuador.167.03eng.htm

 

Atlantic Coast rainforest flooding

On 22 March 2005 environmentalists staged a protest against the Barra Grande dam, Brazil, which will destroy 5,600 ha of highly endangered Atlantic Coast primary araucaria pine forests. The forest once covered the entire coastline of Brazil but has now lost at least 93 per cent of its original cover. Investigations by Brazil’s environmental protection agency, IBAMA, now reveal that the clearing of the primary forest had been omitted in the project’s impact assessment. Based on this report, the federal government authorised the construction of the dam. Activists fighting the destruction of the area condemned this “logic of the done deal” in using fraudulent-studies to license the project.

 

New Publications

FERN has released the first issues in a new series of briefing papers by the European ECA Reform Campaign Corruption: European ECAs under scrutiny and The Baku-Tiblisi-Ceyhan pipeline: exporting an environmental “timebomb. This series aims to inform Brussels decision-makers of new developments in ECA practices at policy and project level. A FERN briefing note on forests and health, Forest Loss and Human Health, is also published in April and focuses on the interdependence between forests and human health and reflecting these concerns in the policies, programmes and projects of the EU.

 

Forest Agenda

19/20 April: NGO Meeting on FSC Plantations Review Process. Bonn, Germany. Info: jutta@fern.org.

1929 April: Stakeholder meeting on the development and review of EU activities under Forest Focus, Brussels, Belgium.

3 May: Seminar in the French Senate on export credits and sustainable development, Paris, France.

16/27 May: United Nations Forum on Forests, 5th Session, UNHQ, New York, USA.

EU Forest Watch is published by FERN, the forest campaign group focusing on EU policy.
To unsubscribe please send an email to info@fern.org requesting removal from our list.

FERN Brussels, 20 Avenue des Celtes, 1040 Brussels, Belgium. http://www.fern.org/
Tel: +32 (0)2 742 2436. Fax: +32 (0)2 736 8054. E-mail: info@fern.org
FERN UK, 1c Fosseway Business Park, Stratford Road, Moreton-in-Marsh, GL56 9NQ, UK.
Tel: +44 (0)1608 652 895. Fax: +44 (0)1608 652 878. E-mail:
info@fern.org