The grim prophecies foreshadowing Jair Bolsonaro’s presidency have been fulfilled with dizzying speed in his first 100 days in office. The EU and its consumers must end their complicity in the unfolding disaster, say Sônia Guajajara and Nicole Polsterer.
When the Portuguese invaders arrived in Brazil more than 500 years ago, there were an estimated three to five million Indigenous Peoples.
As a result, Brazil’s indigenous population today stands at around 850,000.
The first 100 days of Jair Bolsonaro’s presidency are just the latest chapter in this long war of attrition.
In fact, this surge of incursions began even before he assumed the presidency, with the Indigenous Missionary Council (CIMI) reporting a 150 per cent increase in land invasions following Bolsonaro’s victory in the presidential election last October.
Today, 45 per cent of rural Brazil is owned by less has 1 per cent of land owners. It is as if the country has returned to colonial times: only now the conquest is at the hands of the agribusiness sector.
Within hours of taking power, he began attacking the country’s environmental safeguards by issuing an executive order transferring responsibility for setting indigenous land boundaries from the National Indian Foundation, FUNAI, to the Agriculture Ministry.
This was followed by a barrage of measures and announcements with the same aim: advancing the interests of the agribusiness sector, and eroding the strength of those who stand in the way of them bulldozing the country’s precious rainforests and savannahs.
In the first month of his presidency, deforestation in the Amazon reportedly rose 54 per cent on the same month in the previous year.
But it is not just Bolsonaro and the agribusiness sector who bear responsibility for this: those trading in and consuming agricultural goods which have led to human rights violations, or which has been produced on land taken from indigenous communities, cannot simply turn a blind eye to it.
The EU and Brazil share deep economic ties.
The EU is a huge market for Brazilian agricultural exports, in particular, soya and beef – which are major causes of land rights abuses and deforestation in Brazil. In 2017 Brazil accounted for or 42 percent of EU beef imports, and historically soy products accounted for a third of Brazilian agricultural exports to the EU.
What’s more, the EU is also in the throes of negotiating a comprehensive free trade deal with the so-called Mercosur trading bloc, of which Brazil is the largest and most powerful member.
Given all this, the EU is well placed to exert the kind of demand-side financial pressures that could act as a brake on Bolsonaro. As one commentator put it: “For a country that has become an agricultural superpower, exporting massive amounts of soybeans and beef, the loss of even a small part of these markets translates to millions [of dollars].”
With the help of Articulação dos Povos Indígenas do Brasil (APIB), Indigenous Peoples in Brazil are now calling for a boycott of companies which source their material from areas which are riven by conflict.
At the European level, the EU can help stop Brazil’s unfolding calamity by ensuring that neither EU finance, nor products placed in the EU market have violated human rights or caused deforestation.This can be done by passing new laws requiring companies to trace their supply chains fully and making it mandatory for them to know the history of any agricultural commodity they import.
Finally, the Mercosur deal’s negotiators cannot be oblivious to events in Brazil: quite simply, the agreement should not be signed without binding guarantees respecting Indigenous Peoples’ land rights.
Failure to act will see the damage and see more devastation increase: as cattle ranchers and soy producers sweep through the Amazon, Mato Grosso, Mato Grosso do Sul and elsewhere, seizing land, burning forests and polluting rivers.
Indigenous Peoples, who a body of evidence shows are the best guardians of their forests, have resisted the pressures on them for centuries. It is up to the EU – and all those trading in goods which have caused environmental and social damage – to support them.
This article was initially published on Climate Home.